Absolutely rage-inducing advertisement of the day, printed in white text on a black background on a poster pasted on a vacant storefront:
Strippers will not tolerate disrespect... HAHA, just kidding!
A website address beneath the text suggested that there may be a movie associated with this poster. I feel that it is not a movie I want to see. In fact, it is probably a movie I want to wave protest signs in front of.
In cheerier news, instead of writing this afternoon (*facepalm*), I ended up in the basement of Local Independent Bookstore reading Sir Terry Pratchett's Nation. (Then I ended up purchasing the book... remind me not to walk into bookstores.) The plot involves an analogue-Polynesian boy and an aristocratic English girl recreating civilization on a tsunami-wiped island, but the plot itself is only a vehicle for an argument about human dignity and faith and belief and rage against the divine. Oh, and there's a postcolonial reclamation of science from imperialism in there: the Galápagos writes back, or even more precisely, we learn, the Galápagos wrote first. I'm trying to avoid an author-centric critique here, but I can't stifle the sense I get that in writing Nation, Sir Terry manipulates his own, deeply personal, rage and desire for dignity in the face of mortal and divine failures.
Not a perfect book by any means; there are subplots that seem unnecessary and moments of tonal dissonance; but a very fine book, worth reading and worth debating. I keep thinking about how it's a direct reply to Lord of the Flies and an indirect reply to His Dark Materials, but since what I should be thinking about is my dissertation, I'm going to stop my post here and invite comments.
Strippers will not tolerate disrespect... HAHA, just kidding!
A website address beneath the text suggested that there may be a movie associated with this poster. I feel that it is not a movie I want to see. In fact, it is probably a movie I want to wave protest signs in front of.
In cheerier news, instead of writing this afternoon (*facepalm*), I ended up in the basement of Local Independent Bookstore reading Sir Terry Pratchett's Nation. (Then I ended up purchasing the book... remind me not to walk into bookstores.) The plot involves an analogue-Polynesian boy and an aristocratic English girl recreating civilization on a tsunami-wiped island, but the plot itself is only a vehicle for an argument about human dignity and faith and belief and rage against the divine. Oh, and there's a postcolonial reclamation of science from imperialism in there: the Galápagos writes back, or even more precisely, we learn, the Galápagos wrote first. I'm trying to avoid an author-centric critique here, but I can't stifle the sense I get that in writing Nation, Sir Terry manipulates his own, deeply personal, rage and desire for dignity in the face of mortal and divine failures.
Not a perfect book by any means; there are subplots that seem unnecessary and moments of tonal dissonance; but a very fine book, worth reading and worth debating. I keep thinking about how it's a direct reply to Lord of the Flies and an indirect reply to His Dark Materials, but since what I should be thinking about is my dissertation, I'm going to stop my post here and invite comments.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 02:37 am (UTC)Go think about that dissertation ;-Pno subject
Date: 2009-10-06 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 07:39 am (UTC)That link will inform you that irritated citizens successfully lobbied to have the ads removed from Chicago buses with a swiftness.
Not here, of course.
N
no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 11:29 am (UTC)I bought Unseen Academicals this morning (five pounds off voucher, hurray!), so am looking forward to reading his latest, post-diagnosis, soon.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-06 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-07 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-07 05:26 am (UTC)I don't think there were any unnecessary subplots. I thought it was lean and tight. I'd like to hear which you thought were extraneous. In general, I thought it was a cathartic fantasy from a modern author plagued by the guilt of his nation's imperialist history.