Via
catamorphism: Henry Louis Gates Jr., Alphonse Fletcher University Professor at Harvard University and one of the world's most distinguished scholars of African-American literature, was arrested last week in front of his own house. Apparently, having some difficulty with his front door lock, Professor Gates attempted to break the lock open... and some passerby or neighbor called 911 to report that a black man was breaking into a house in Cambridge. When a police officer arrived and asked Professor Gates to step out of the house and provide his information, the professor said, "Why, because I'm a black man in America?" and refused to leave his house or identify himself.
They arrested Professor Gates for disorderly conduct. He was released on the same day, and a Harvard Law professor is taking his case.
Take a look at the police incident report (PDF). Then read the comments at the Boston Globe article, including this gem of utter logic failure:
Enough of throwing down the race card ... we have a Black President now, so that tired old ship has sailed. The guy got indignant like any self-important Harvard professor does, pulled the old "Do you know who I am?" routine, and got arrested as a result.
That's not what happened. Professor Gates came to the attention of the police because, as he said, he is a black man in America. Because he's an eminent and spectacularly well-connected black man in America, he's unlikely to get into any lasting trouble because of this arrest... but hundreds and thousands of other black men in America don't have the professor's advantages.
Edit: I am freezing this post. This is not aimed at any specific commenter. Because I'm crossing the country tomorrow, I won't have time to monitor the discussion, and I'd rather close the post before anything more incendiary is said in my journal.
Also, you might all be interested to know that the charge against Professor Gates has been dropped. I think we can all agree that that's good news.
They arrested Professor Gates for disorderly conduct. He was released on the same day, and a Harvard Law professor is taking his case.
Take a look at the police incident report (PDF). Then read the comments at the Boston Globe article, including this gem of utter logic failure:
Enough of throwing down the race card ... we have a Black President now, so that tired old ship has sailed. The guy got indignant like any self-important Harvard professor does, pulled the old "Do you know who I am?" routine, and got arrested as a result.
That's not what happened. Professor Gates came to the attention of the police because, as he said, he is a black man in America. Because he's an eminent and spectacularly well-connected black man in America, he's unlikely to get into any lasting trouble because of this arrest... but hundreds and thousands of other black men in America don't have the professor's advantages.
Edit: I am freezing this post. This is not aimed at any specific commenter. Because I'm crossing the country tomorrow, I won't have time to monitor the discussion, and I'd rather close the post before anything more incendiary is said in my journal.
Also, you might all be interested to know that the charge against Professor Gates has been dropped. I think we can all agree that that's good news.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:36 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:40 pm (UTC)Besides which, the do-you-know-who-I-am defense is perfectly logical when a person, accused of breaking into a house, can prove that it's actually his house and he actually lives there.
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:40 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:46 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:44 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:48 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:46 pm (UTC)If they've started arresting people for breaking into their own homes, I'm in lots of trouble. Idiot!Lint locks herself out at least once a year. Oh, wait, I'm a white girl - I couldn't possibly have any evil intentions for breaking into a building! /sarcasm
(Thanks for keeping me posted on the news, here, though. Honestly. Bostonians, you are always assholes - this week, you are also idiots.)
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:02 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 09:48 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 03:48 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:05 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:06 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:09 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:09 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:15 pm (UTC)That said, if Gates produced some evidence that he was the homeowner and the officer showed a disinclination to believe him (as with the neauroscience professor's story), that might be another story.
He showed his driver's license (which, presumably, contained his address) and Harvard ID while he was inside the house. The officer arrested him after that (for being uppity, I can only assume) What more are you looking for?
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:41 am (UTC)My experience as well. Even with the New York Times.
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:06 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:20 pm (UTC)In the case of Prof. Gates, the police are presumably going to get called out for their actions, but as you note, so many other individuals don't have the ability to leverage their reputations or notoriety to address what's going on. And even the act of issuing what basically amounts to trumped-up charges gets set aside as just the bad behavior of one or two individual police, when in fact it seems to be a consistent abuse of power from city to city.
ETA: I should add, in spite of my irritation at these activities, that I've gained the impression, over conversations with a friend of mine who is a policeman, that regulations pretty much push police towards issuing some sort of ticket as a way of validating a pull-over or other inquiry (though not always).
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 01:52 am (UTC)(This thread's about to be frozen; it has nothing to do with you. See the edit to the main post for more details.)
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 11:23 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 01:46 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:04 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 01:53 am (UTC)(This thread's about to be frozen; it has nothing to do with you. See the edit to the main post for more details.)
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 02:34 am (UTC)The police in this incident get the Saito Hajime seal of disapproval.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 01:53 am (UTC)(This thread's about to be frozen; it has nothing to do with you. See the edit to the main post for more details.)
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 05:39 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 01:54 am (UTC)(This thread's about to be frozen; it has nothing to do with you. See the edit to the main post for more details.)