A Scholar's Lament
Oct. 8th, 2004 01:48 pmLately I've been doing some research on Robert Graves's beautiful, bizarre, deeply influential monstrosity of attempted anthropological research, The White Goddess. It's quite frustrating, because all the criticism I've found so far fits into three categories:
1. Scholarship that proclaims The White Goddess to be utter trash, bearing no resemblance to actual religious beliefs and practices of early medieval Britain.
2. Scholarship that examines The White Goddess as it relates to Graves's warped personal life.
3. "Scholarship" that assumes The White Goddess is a factual and important account of the true, formerly-neglected Triple Goddess of the Celts.
I'm looking for, and have not found, work that treats The White Goddess as a fascinating literary invention in its own right, and examines it for its content and, perhaps, its influence on other authors.
Usually, when I find a large hole in current scholarship, it excites me. There's clearly a great deal of research left to be done here, and I can do it. The problem is that I have very different plans for my dissertation. Will not become obsessed with Robert Graves. Will not become obsessed with Robert Graves.
1. Scholarship that proclaims The White Goddess to be utter trash, bearing no resemblance to actual religious beliefs and practices of early medieval Britain.
2. Scholarship that examines The White Goddess as it relates to Graves's warped personal life.
3. "Scholarship" that assumes The White Goddess is a factual and important account of the true, formerly-neglected Triple Goddess of the Celts.
I'm looking for, and have not found, work that treats The White Goddess as a fascinating literary invention in its own right, and examines it for its content and, perhaps, its influence on other authors.
Usually, when I find a large hole in current scholarship, it excites me. There's clearly a great deal of research left to be done here, and I can do it. The problem is that I have very different plans for my dissertation. Will not become obsessed with Robert Graves. Will not become obsessed with Robert Graves.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-08 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-08 09:41 pm (UTC)(I get to revise my 510B paper this weekend, wheee!)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-08 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 03:18 am (UTC)...you know you want to...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 05:52 am (UTC)Maybe I'll do that work of scholarship on Graves some day. At least, insofar as it relates to children's literature...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-10 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-10 09:28 am (UTC)The following explanation is deeply oversimplified:
Once there was an anthropological theory that claimed that all folktales, legends, incomprehensible fragmented poems, et cetera, exist in their current, deeply frustrating forms in order to hide certain religious mysteries that could not be expressed clearly for fear of revealing those mysteries to the general public.
Robert Graves espoused this theory. The White Goddess is, among other things, Graves's attempt to translate a large number of very difficult medieval poems into a single statement about the nature of the universe. This single statement could roughly be summarized, "All of the arts exist as worship of the beautiful, cruel, all-encompassing mother-lover-crone-goddess who is muse of everyone and everything."
In trying to prove this statement, Graves resorts to all sorts of numerology, rune shuffling, riddling, and otherwise deeply dubious textual play. His opus has no footnotes and no bibliography. One really can't use his conclusions to prove any kind of real scholarly point, although I have the suspicion that some of his contentions have snuck, unproven, into the basic framework of literature studies.
What fascinates me, though, about Graves and The White Goddess, is that by opening himself to unscholarly methods of approach to his material, Graves does something very interesting and un-anthropological. Instead of finding a true history of the early Middle Ages in Britain, Graves ends up inventing a fabulous and exciting narrative himself. He creates the mythology which underpins modern Wicca. He assembles a collection of stories that later serves as the nucleus for Susan Cooper's Dark is Rising books and Lloyd Alexander's Prydain books, among other masterpieces of modern fantasy. Graves's work deserves to be pooh-poohed as anthropology -- and hailed as literature. The pooh-poohing has happened, but the hailing has not. Actually, let me qualify that. Perhaps it may be more accurate to say that lay readers have hailed The White Goddess as narrative and taken it as fact, while scholarly readers have scoffed at the book for its facts and barely examined its narrative qualities.
Does that answer the question?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-10 03:07 pm (UTC)Mostly explained, except -- if I wrote incomprehensible fragmented poems, would that mean I knew something I didn't?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-11 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-21 01:10 am (UTC)